Aircraft News Weblog

Category: Nippon

  • B787 Dreamliner battery fix?

    There is some progress in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner battery problems. Boeing have given the FAA full details of a fix for the Lithium Ion battery overheating problem. Although the details are being kept under wraps, the fix has to include a new container for the battery which will prevent damage to the aircraft in case of fire and a method of venting fumes outside. There also has to be a redesign of the wiring or monitoring system to prevent the battery overheating in the first place.

    Further investigation in Japan, where both All Nippon Airways and JAL have had battery incidents on their Dreamliner’s, has resulted in wiring problems being discovered connecting the APU and the Aircraft main battery. The details of these problems are still being investigated and reported to Boeing.

    The original problem with the battery has not been discovered so all possible causes have been identified and fixes proposed to address them. The real test will be when the aircraft starts operating again as there is only so much that can be simulated on the ground or by controlled test flights.

    A long term fix may be the change of the battery type but nobody is talking about that.

    The update from the NTSB that was published in December 2014 blamed the battery problem on the design and possible manufacturing issues with the batteries. The blame was spread between the FAA and Boeing for not considering the consequences or even possibility of a battery cell overheating and affecting other cells. The manufacturing process was also targeted with foreign material found to be introduced into the batteries.

  • Dreamliner

    The Boeing 787 Dreamliner has had a most unfortunate couple of weeks. There has been the worst publicity that any aircraft could have. An inflight fire or smoke in the cabin are the worst case scenario for aircrew and the public when it comes to air travel.

    I have avoided the temptation to jump on the band wagon as I have had the experience of working on an newly introduced aircraft type. There is no test like the daily operation of an aircraft, or any vehicle, to bring out a number of problems that the designer and regulatory authorities have not thought of. The Dreamliner has taken this to a whole new level with the type of problem and the world wide grounding of the fleet. If that wasn’t bad enough then the timeline of not only the fix but understanding the cause is seeing the confidence of the carriers fade away.

    There is only so much that the airlines can put up with before the shareholders make the decision to abandon the aircraft and look elsewhere in the competitive world of aircraft supply. Not only that but all the time the airlines are not flying the Dreamliner’s they already operate, the bills are piling up and the lawyers are lining up.

    The battery on the aircraft is touted as the source of the problem,which is ironic as it is there to solve problems when the normal power generation is not operating. This is not the first time this type of battery has given trouble. Cessna had them removed from the new Citation. In that case there was an off the shelf replacement which they could switch to. But it is my understanding that the Dreamliner batteries are so specific to the aircraft that a replacement is not possible in the short term. The whole aircraft is such a new concept that they are breaking ground in many aspects of the systems on board.

    I love the innovation and cutting edge development. But I think they had too much faith put into the battery type without a ‘plan B’. Lets hope the investigation comes to a successful conclusion soon for the sake of the company and the travelling public.