Aircraft News Weblog

Category: aircraft fire

  • Q400 Landing Gear Collapse: Causes and Impact

    A Q400 aircraft landing at Halifax International Airport in Nova Scotia suffered a landing gear collapse after an uneventful flight. The Transportation Safety Board initial report found that the aircraft had a tire failure on takeoff. Upon landing, the tire remnants started rotating. This caused enough vibration for the main landing gear to unlock and collapse.

    When the propeller contacted the runway the blades broke off and the engine was badly damaged. The aircrew declared a Mayday and secured the aircraft for an emergency evacuation on the runway. All passengers and crew successfully left the aircraft with no serious injuries.

    As the investigation continues I would like to describe the configuration of the landing gear on the Q400. On the Down selection, the gear doors open. The main landing gear is hydraulically lowered aft from the engine nacelle. The Actuator linkage travels overcenter and locks, the landing gear doors then close again. It is held in the down position by hydraulic pressure and large springs.

    The Q400 is over 25 years old and is no longer in production. It is operated all over the world and has proven to be a reliable aircraft. The failure of the landing gear due to tire remnants vibration is not a new problem. It is unlikely the investigation will call for major modifications as a solution to this accident.

  • Singapore Airlines B777 Fire on Landing

    Singapore Airlines Flt SQ368 to Milan returned to Singapore Changi airport after a low oil indication on the right hand engine. The crew handled the return by the book and the aircraft landed with no issues and to a round of applause from the 222 passengers on board. However, the applause was short lived as it became apparent the right hand wing was fully engulfed in flames. Remarkably the passengers and crew remained on board and calmly waited for the emergency services to extinguish the flames before disembarking via a set of steps! This would not have been believable in a work of fiction but there a videos from the aircraft passengers who passed the time recording the event through the aircraft windows. Kudos to them and the crew for not rushing into an uncertain mass evacuation and possible injury at the first sign of danger. I can  only assume the crew were following the instructions of the emergency services to remain on board. The following is a media release from the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore. 

    Media Release

    27 Jun 2016

    CAAS Media Statement on Singapore Airlines (SQ368) Incident

    Early this morning, SQ368, a Singapore Airlines (SIA) B777 aircraft bound for Milan, chose to return to Singapore as the indicator for its right engine had shown oil loss.
    Shortly after landing, a fire was observed to have occurred in the vicinity of the aircraft’s right engine. Changi’s Airport Emergency Service, which was already on standby, responded promptly and the fire was extinguished within 5 minutes. SATS also contributed to ensuring the safety of the passengers and flight crew. No one was hurt during the incident.
    The runway on which the aircraft landed was closed for about 5 hours for repairs and clean-up. Landings and take-offs continued on the other runway. Whilst some flights were impacted, all flights were able to take off within one hour of their scheduled departure times.  
    CAAS will be investigating to determine the causes of the incident. The Ministry of Transport’s Air Accident Investigation Bureau will also be conducting an independent investigation.  

  • Dreamliner Nightmare.

    Dreamliner fire at Heathrow.

    How much bad luck can an aircraft type have before the orders dry up and the the public wont fly on it? The one thing which can kill an aircraft is the tendency to have fires. The public will not want to be on an airliner which is periodically filling with smoke.

    When this aircraft concept was announced many years ago I knew that this would be a unique design and be, to use the over worked cliche, cutting edge.There would be huge challenges with the extensive use of composites, the reduction of traditional, proven hydraulic systems and the complete exclusion of the use of bleed air from the engines. All of these were completely different from the traditional method of constructing and operating an airliner.

    There were numerous set backs in the development which raised costs into billions of dollars. Then after the aircraft went into service the aircraft lithium ion batteries failed to operate correctly resulting in a worldwide grounding of the Dreamliner. With this problem resolved, but not solved, we now find ourselves with a fire in an Ethiopian Airlines aircraft at Heathrow which is being attributed to the ELT, the device which transmits an emergency location signal when triggered by a high G situation. This problem, if proven, is as unique as the aircraft due to the scarcity of any other incidents related to this component. The most common failure is an unintentional transmission due to a faulty ELT, but a fire is not something that anyone can recall being reported before.

    I hesitate to mention it but the ELT is powered by lithium ion batteries and that could really be the only source of power to start a fire. The British investigators have now called for all B787 ELT’s to be removed or set inert during the investigation.

    The technology in the Dreamliner is unique and Boeing are taking the lead, and the hits, for this innovation. Maybe, like Concorde before it, the Dreamliner will be a fantastic one off airliner when all the problems are resolved. There is no doubt that composite will be used in other aircraft, but the extensive use of new electrical systems will need more development before other manufactures jump on that band wagon.

    I can only imagine the stress being felt in the boardroom of Boeing in Seattle but I think there is nothing left to do but work with the regulators and get this Boeing going.